|
Synonymy:
Aequipecten gibbus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Pecten gibbus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Potentially Misidentified Species:
Valve color and shell morphometry are used to
distinguish calico scallops from related species. Argopecten gibbus
is distinguished by its yellowish to white base color splotched with patches of
bright red, maroon, or lavender. It is also slightly convex in the left (upper)
valve (Broom 1976). Two other scallops that are documented to occur in the
Indian River Lagoon are similar in size and overall shape. The bay
scallop, Argopecten irradians, is generally a uniform gray to gray-brown
color with distinct convexity of the right (lower) valve. The rough scallop,
Aequipecten muscosus, may also be mistaken for the calico scallop. However,
the rough scallop has unequal wings and sharp scales on lower surface of the
ribs, with shell color ranging into shades of yellow and brown.
II. HABITAT AND
DISTRIBUTION
Regional Occurrence:
The range of the calico scallop extends from Maryland through Florida, the Gulf
of Mexico, and south to Brazil, including Bermuda and much of the Caribbean.
IRL Distribution:
Argopecten gibbus is not considered common within the Indian River Lagoon.
While it is sometimes observed in or around inlet areas, it is primarily found
in nearshore and offshore waters where it supports a commercial fishery (Arnold
1995; Moyer and Blake, 1986; Blake and
Moyer 1991).
III. LIFE HISTORY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY
Age, Size, Lifespan:
Argopecten gibbus reaches 40 60 mm (1.6 2.4 inches) shell height and
approximately 80 mm (3.2 inches) in shell length. It lives an average of 20
months, with a maximum life expectancy of 24 months (Allen and Costello 1972).
Abundance:
Cape Canaveral, Florida has been reported as the enter
of abundance in the range of calico scallops, and may be a source of supply
larvae to areas north of Florida by transport in Gulf Stream currents (Roe et
al. 1971). Scallop grounds offshore of Cape Canaveral are among the
World's largest, extending from St. Augustine south to Stuart, Florida.
Vast scallop beds occur within this area, some measuring over 2,600 feet in
length, and 8,600 feet in width (Allen and Costello 1972).
Roe et al.
(1971) reported the abundance of calico scallops varies within and between areas
on a seasonal basis.
Locomotion:
Scallops are one of only a few Molluscan groups that
have the ability to swim actively, especially as a predator avoidance response.
Argopecten
gibbus, like most scallops, swims horizontally to the substratum by quickly adducting its valves to propel
itself on jets of water (Donovan et al 2004). Examinations of shell
morphometry in relation to swimming ability in scallops found that the
relatively thinner shell and slight left convexity of the left (upper) valve
generate more lift during swimming, and thus produce the long range swimming
ability and speed of Argopecten gibbus, which may swim as much as 9 body
lengths per second (Stanley 1970; Donovan et. al. 2004) Small scallops tend to swim more
actively than larger ones.
Reproduction:
Argopecten gibbus reach sexual maturity at approximately 4 months of age,
or when they reach a size of 19 mm shell height (Miller et al. 1979;
Arnold 1995), though Roe et al. (1971) found that sexual maturity correlates
more to size rather than age.
Spawning and
recruitment in calico scallops occur throughout the year (Allen, 1979), with
healthy individuals spawning as much as 3 - 4 times (Roe et al. 1971;
Arnold 1995). Maximum reproductive
effort occurs from late fall through spring, with fall spawning being somewhat
less intense than
spring spawning (Moyer and Blake, 1986). Despite its decreased intensity,
some evidence suggests that fall spawns may be crucial to maintaining standing stocks
of calico scallops in the following year (Moyer and Blake, 1986).
Calico scallops are sequential
hermaphrodites, first releasing sperm in to the water column followed by eggs,
likely in response to changes in water temperature due to upwelling effects
(Arnold 1995).
Embryology:
Eggs develop into free-swimming trochophore larvae within 48 hours of
fertilization. The larval stage persists 14-16 days before settlement,
typically on hard substrata. Most commonly, settlement occurs on
disarticulated shells from previous generations of scallops (Arnold 1995).
Juvenile scallops attach to substrata via byssal threads and will remain
attached until they reach 2.5 cm (1 inch) in shell length in approximately 3
months (Allen 1979).
Argopecten gibbus that settle in spring
generally reach a size of 3035 mm shell height by the following fall and are
fully able to reproduce. As a result of this rapid growth and early maturation,
scallop cohorts may overlap, with many different size classes occupying the same
bed.
IV. PHYSICAL TOLERANCES
Salinity:
In areas where Argopecten gibbus is most common, salinity typically
ranges between 31 - 37 (Arnold 1995).
V. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY
Trophic Mode:
Calico scallops feed primarily on
microalgae, diatoms, bacteria, and organic particulates which are filtered over the gills and passed to the
mouth via cilliary tracts.
Habitat:
Typical habitat is open marine or saline
estuarine waters from the subtidal zone to the continental shelf, in depths of
30 - 1200 feet (Roe et al. 1971; Allen and Costello 1972), with scallop
beds typically distributed parallel to the coastline. Roe et al. (1971)
found that calico scallop beds north of Cape Canaveral tend to occur in deeper
waters than those more to the south.
Typical benthos types for Argopecten gibbus
include unconsolidated sediments that may be composed of hard sand, sand with
shell hash, quartz sand, and sand-gravel.
Associated Species:
Predators of Argopecten gibbus juveniles and adults include sea stars,
gastropod mollusks, squid, octopods, crabs, sharks, rays, and several species of
bony fishes (Roe et al. 1971; Broom 1976; Arnold 1995;
Donovan et al. 2004).
VI. SPECIAL STATUS
Special Status:
None.
Fisheries Importance:
The calico scallop commercial fishery is highly variable and unpredictable
(Arnold, 1995) (Figures 1 and 2 below) and is centered entirely in the waters
around Cape Canaveral in northern Brevard County. It has sometimes been a
high value fishery, with commercial harvests of over $19.5 million in both 1987
and 1988. However, the fishery has been plagued with problems, not only in
unpredictable and highly variable recruitment of scallops, but also with
parasitic infestations, which have been devastating to commercial harvests.
Population crashes in 1989 and 1991 (Figures 1 and 2) have been directly
attributed to infestation by a protozoan parasite of the genus Marteilia
(Moyer et al 1993). In 1989, Marteilia caused a massive die-off of
calico scallops within a 2500 square mile area off Brevard County, decreasing
the commercial harvest to $6.6 million, less than half of the $19.5 million
catch from each of the previous 2 years. This same parasite reappeared in
1991, when it was first detected in apparently healthy scallop beds in January.
By February, few adult scallops remained alive. The commercial fishery has
never fully recovered; as can be seen by the decreased harvests in the years
that followed. Note that there are no commercial landings reported for
1996. In that year, commercial boats switched their fishing efforts
primarily to rock shrimp (Arnold 1995).
Within the 5 county area encompassing the IRL (Volusia,
Brevard, Indian River, St. Lucie and Martin Counties) the commercial catch of
the calico scallop, Argopecten gibbus, between 1987 - 2001,
accounts for nearly 100% of the statewide total, with a harvest of approximately 38
million pounds, and a value in excess of $55.8 million. This
ranks the calico scallop third in both commercial value within the IRL, and in
pounds harvested.
Figures 1 and 2 below show the dollar value of the
calico scallop
fishery to IRL counties by year. Brevard County reaped 100% of the
commercial value of calico scallops, due to the richness of the scalloping beds
off Cape Canaveral. Note in figure 2 that the first 3 years of data have
been removed to show some additional scale detail in the remaining years.
Commercial harvests for calico scallops were lowest in 1996 ($0) and 1991
($38,220), and highest in 1987 and 1988 when catches exceeded 10 million pounds
annually and were valued in excess of $19.5 million each year.

Figure 1.
Annual dollar value of the commercial catch of calico scallop to the 5-county
area of
the Indian River Lagoon.

Figure 2.
Annual dollar value of the commercial catch of calico scallop to the 5-county
area of the Indian River Lagoon with the years
1987 - 1989 removed, to show improved
detail.
|
|
VOLUSIA |
BREVARD |
INDIAN |
ST. |
MARTIN |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
RIVER |
LUCIE |
|
|
| |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Value |
|
YEAR |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
to IRL |
|
1987 |
$0 |
$19,659,761 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$19,659,761 |
|
1988 |
$0 |
$19,504,357 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$19,504,357 |
|
1989 |
$0 |
$6,635,069 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$6,635,069 |
|
1990 |
$0 |
$820,165 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$820,165 |
|
1991 |
$0 |
$38,220 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$38,220 |
|
1992 |
$0 |
$174,302 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$174,302 |
|
1993 |
$0 |
$424,049 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$424,049 |
|
1994 |
$0 |
$2,680,851 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$2,680,851 |
|
1995 |
$0 |
$632,236 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$632,236 |
|
1996 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
1997 |
$0 |
$1,528,334 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$1,528,334 |
|
1998 |
$0 |
$327,324 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$327,324 |
|
1999 |
$0 |
$1,726,406 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$1,726,406 |
|
2000 |
$0 |
$300,919 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$300,919 |
|
2001 |
$0 |
$387,322 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$387,322 |
|
Cumulative Totals: |
$0 |
$54,839,315 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$54,839,315 |
Table 1. Total dollar value of the IRL
harvest of calico scallop Argopecten gibbus,
between
1987 -2001.
VII. REFERENCES
Allen, D.M. 1979. Biological
aspects of the calico scallop, Argopecten gibbus,
determined by spat monitoring. The Nautilus 94:
107119.
Allen, D.M. and T.J. Costello. 1972.
The calico scallop, Argopecten gibbus.
NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF-656. 19 pp.
Arnold, W.S. 1995.
Summary report on the calico scallop (Argopecten gibbus)
fishery of the southeastern United States.
Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, Florida Marine Research
Institute, 22 pp.
Blake, N.J. and M.A. Moyer.
1991. The calico scallop, Argopecten gibbus,
fishery of Cape Canaveral, Florida. In: Shumway, S.E.
(ed). Scallops: Biology,
Ecology and Aquaculture. Elsevier Science Publishing
Company, Inc., New
York, N.Y., pp. 899911.
Broom, M.J. 1976. Synopsis of
biological data on scallops (Chlamys
(Aequipecten) opercularis (Linnaeus)
Argopecten irradians (Lamarck)
Argopecten gibbus (Linnaeus)) FOA Fish Synopsis No.
14 (FIRS/S114)
43 pp.
Castagna, M. and P. E. Chanley.
1973. Salinity tolerance of some marine
bivalves from inshore and estuarine environments in
Virginian waters on the
western Mid-Atlantic Coast. Malacology 12:14-96
Cheng, J.Y. and M.E. DeMont. 1996.
Jet-propelled swimming in scallops:
swimming mechanics and ontogenic scaling. Can. Journ.
Zool.
74: 1734-1748.
Costello, T.J., J.H. Hudson,
J.L. Dupuy, S. Rivkin. 1973. Larval culture of the
calico scallop, Argopecten gibbus. Proc. Natl.
Shellfish. Assoc. 63: 7276.
Cummins, R., Jr. 1971. Calico scallops of the
southeastern United States,
195969. NOAA NMFS Spec. Sci. Rpt.Fish. 627: 22 pp.
Donovan, D.A., J.P. Elias and J.
Baldwin. 2004. Swimming behavior and
morphometry of the file shell Limaria fragilis. Mar.
Fresh. Behav. Physiol.
37(1):7-16.
Kirby-Smith, W. 1970. Growth of the
scallops Argopecten irradians
concentricus and Argopecten gibbus, as influenced by
food and temperature.
PhD. Thesis, Duke University. In: Fay, C.W.,
R.J. Neves and G.B. Pardue.
1983. Species Profiles: Life Histories and
Environmental Requirements of
Coastal Fishes and Invertebrates (Mid-Atlantic) - Bay
Scallop. U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Division of Biological Services, FWS/OBS-82/11.12.
U.S.
Army Corps. Of Engineers, TR EL-82-4. 17 pp.
Miller, G.C., D.M. Allen, T.J.
Costello, J.H. Hudson 1979. Maturation of the
calico scallop, Argopecten gibbus, determined by
ovarian color changes.
Northeast Gulf Sci. 3: 96103.
Moyer, M.A. and N.J. Blake.
1986. Fluctuations in calico scallop production
(Argopecten gibbus). Proc. 11th Ann. Tropical
and Subtropical Fish. Conf.
of the Americas: 4558.
Roe, R.B., R. Cummins, Jr.,
H.R. Bullis, Jr. 1971. Calico scallop distribution,
abundance, and yield off eastern Florida, 1967-68.
Fish. Bull. 69: 399409.
Stanley, S.M. 1970. Relation of
shell form to life habits in the Bivalvia
(Mollusca). Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 125:1-296.
Wells, H.W., M.J. Wells, I.E.
Gray 1964. The calico scallop community in
North Carolina. Bull. Mar. Sci. 14: 561593.
Report by: K. Hill,
Smithsonian Marine Station
Submit additional information, photos or comments to:
irl_webmaster@si.edu
Page last updated: March 16, 2005
|