Gobiosoma robustum is a small, unscaled goby that is somewhat
variable in coloration. The body typically bears several irregular,
interconnected dark bands with pale spots that give a chain-like
appearance. A distinctive series of dark dots and dashes occur along the
mid-side (Robbins et al. 1986). The resemblance of these markings to a
visual representation of Morse code gives the animal its common name. The
outer row of teeth is enlarged in the upper and lower jaws (GRI undated).
The body depth is typically 16-23% of standard length (Hoese and Moore
Dawson (1966) notes the species typically possesses 9-11 anal rays, 11-13
second dorsal rays, and 15-17 pectoral rays. Robbins et al. (1986) cite the
most common count as: 12 dorsal rays; 10 anal fin rays; 16-17 pectoral fin
rays. The first dorsal typically has a spine count of VII and a pelvic
spine and ray count of I, 5 (GRI undated).
Potentially Misidentified Species
Code gobies co-occur throughout their range with a very large number of
other small, very similar gobiid fishes. Positive differentiation among
these typically requires close examination and comparison of ray and scale
counts and body part measurements by experienced biologists. Ray counts
and size measurements overlap to a great degree with some co-occurring
species such as Gobiosoma bosci, and microhabitat preferences of the
various species may be helpful in making identifications (e.g., see Dawson
HABITAT AND DISTRIBUTION
Gobiosoma robustum is a subtropical western Atlantic species
reported in Florida from Cape Canaveral to the Florida Keys, and throughout
the Gulf of Mexico. Accounts from the Bahamas and Jamaica are likely
erroneous (GRI undated).
The published northern distributional limit of this species is somewhat
south of the northernmost limits of the Indian River Lagoon system, although it is common
in the IRL from Cape Canaveral south.
LIFE HISTORY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY
Age, Size, Lifespan
Brown-Peterson et al. (1993) report a size range for Gobiosoma
robustum of 11.3-45.2 mm SL, and a median size of 22.4 mm SL. Robbins
et al. (1986) give a maximum total length of the species as 50 mm.
The maximum reported age for the species is one year (Froese and Pauly
Tolan et al. (1997) list Gobiosoma robustum as among the top five
most abundant fish in a seasonal seargass study from Redfish Bay, TX.
Llanso et al. (1998) report G. robustum as one of two benthic rank
dominant fish from Double Branch Bay, Upper Tampa Bay, FL. Florida Bay
trawl collections conducted in 1984-1985 reveal a density of 4.5
individuals/ha, and collections made a decade later yielded 7.5
individuals/ha (Thayer et al. 1999). Sampling within seagrass beds
themselves yields a considerably higher mean density of 1-4 individuals per
square meter (Matheson et al. 1999).
Reproduction in Gobiosoma robustum is sexual, and the sexes are
separate. As with most gobies, G. robustum is a demersal spawning
species in which breeding males and females both care for the eggs [from
generalized family info on:
http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2002-09/hcs3/index.php (Smith 1997).
Garcia et al. (1988) notes that spawning occurs throughout the year in a
population from a lagoon in Campeche, Mexico, with maximal spawning
occurring in the cold, dry season when salinity levels become elevated.
Details regarding embryologic development are lacking. Eggs are elliptical,
around 1.5 mm long and 0.5 mm wide (Coleman et al 1991).
Code gobies are restricted in their distribution to the subtropics (Froese
and Pauly 2008). Dawson (1966) discovered a pronounced seasonality in the
presence of Gobiosoma robustum im Mississippi Sound, and noted
individuals were scarce in mod-winter. Water temperatures during this
author's study ranged from 13°C to nearly 35°C. Springer and Woodburn
(1960) cite 10°C as the lower temperature limit for the species.
Gobiosoma robustum is a eurythermal estuarine species. Dawson
(1966) reports collecting individuals from environments of low salinity
(6.2 ppt) in Mississippi Sound, although 83% of individuals were collected
at salinities of 22.3-32.3 ppt. Kilby (1955) observed salinity extremes of
7 ppt and 37.6 ppt for the secies. Gunter (1956) included G.
robustum in his revised list of euryhaline American fishes, in which he
strictly defined euryhaline species as those that have been recorded from
both fresh water and pure seawater by competent observers. Bailey et al.
(1954), by contrast, indicate G. robustum is a facultative invader
of low salinity waters but does not enter fresh water except as a temporary
straggler or very young animal.
Gobiosoma robustum preys on several small invertebrate species,
including shrimp, gammaridean amphipods, and caprellid amphipods (Caine
Schofield (2003) experimentally demonstrated that G. robustum was
able to competitively displace clown gobies (Microgobius gulosus), forcing
them out of structured (artificial seagrass) habitat and into bare sand.
The results of this study suggest that habitat selection of these two
species is modified in areas where they co-occur.
Llanso et al. (1998) note that red drum (Scaenops ocellatus) often
prey on Gobiosoma robustum, while McMichael and Peters (1989) report
G. robustum is a component in the diet of spotted seatrout
Laboratory experiments by Schofield (2005) reveal that G. robustum
remained susceptible to predation by toadfish (Opsanus beta)
regardless of the presence or absence of structurally complex seagrass in
which to seek refuge.
Hutton and Sogandares-Bernal (1960) list Diphterostomum americanum
(Platyhelminthes: Digenea) as a known parasite of code gobies in Florida.
Code gobies are cryptic benthic fishes commonly encountered within seagrass
meadows and algal mats of shallow, protected waters (Robbins et al. 1986,
Froese and Pauly 2008). The species is demersal but non-burrowing, as
compared, for example, to the co-occurring burrowing goby Microgobius
gulosus (Schofield 2005). Hoese and Moore (1977) indicate Thalassia
testudinum as the preferred seagrass habitat. They appear to be less
sensitive than canopy-dwelling species to declines in seagrass cover
(Matheson et al. 1999, Fourqurean and Robblee 1999). Less commonly, code
gobies can be found in mangrove habitats (Lorenz 1999).
Patrick and Palavage (1994) list G. robustum as a pollution-tolerant
A number of commercially and recreationally important species depend on
G. robustum as a food source.
Bailey RM, Winn HE, and C Lavett Smith. 1954. Fishes from the Escambia
River, Alabama and Florida, with ecologic and taxonomic notes. Proceedings
of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 106:109-164.
Breder CM Jr. 1942. On the reproduction of Gobiosoma robustum
Ginsburg. Zoologica 27:61-64.
Brown-Peterson NJ, Peterson MS, Rydene DA, and RW Eames. 1993. Fish
assemblages in natural versus well-established recolonized seagrass
meadows. Estuaries 16:177-189.
Caine EA. 1983. Community Interactions of Caprella penantis Leach
(Crustacea: Amphipoda) on Sea Whips Journal of Crustacean Biology
Caldwell KD. 1966. Marine and freshwater fishes of Jamaica. Bulletin if the
Institute of Jamaica 17:7-109.
Coleman RM. 1991. Measuring parental investment in nonspherical eggs.
Dawson CE. 1966. Studies on the gobies (Pisces-Gobiidae) of Mississippi
Sound and adjacent waters. American Midlands Naturalist 76:379-409.
Fourqurean JW and MB Robblee. 1999. Florida Bay: A history of recent
ecological changes. Estuaries 22:345-357.
Froese R and D Pauly (Eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic
publication. Available online.
Gobioid research Institute (GRI). Undated. Gobiosoma rubustum
species description page. Available online.
Gunter G. 1956. A revised list of euryhalin fshes of North and Middle
America. American Midland Naturalis 56:345-354.
Hoese HD and RH Moore. 1977. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico. Texas,
Louisiana, and Adjacent Waters. Texas A&M University Press, College Station
TX. 327 p.
Hutton RF and F Sogandares-Bernal. 1960. A list of parasites from marine
and coastal animals of Florida. Transactions of the American Microscopical
Society 79:287 -292.
Kilby JD. 1955. The fishes of two Gulf coastal marsh areas of Florida.
Tulane Studies in Zoology 2:175-247.
Lorenz JJ. 1999. The response of fishes to physicochemical changes in the
mangroves of northeast Florida Bay. Estuaries 22:500-517
Matheson RE, Camp JDK, Sogard SM, and KA Bjorgo. 1999. Changes in
seagrass-associated fish and crustacean communities on Florida Bay mud
banks: The effects of recent ecosystem changes? Estuaries 22:534-551.
McMichael R Jr. and KM Peters. Early life history of spotted seatrout,
Cynoscion nebulosus (Pisces: Sciaenidae), in Tampa Bay, Florida.
Food habits of red drum and spotted seatrout in a restored mangrove
Llanso RJ, Bell SS, and FE Vose. 1998. Food habits of red drum and spotted seatrout in a
restored mangrove Impoundment. Estuaries 21, 294-306.
Patrick R and DM Palavage. 1994. The value of species as indicators of
water quality. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of
Robins CR, Ray GC, and J Douglas. 1986. A Field Guide to Atlantic Coast
Fishes. The Peterson Field Guide Series. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston. 354
Schofield PJ. 2003. Habitat selection of two gobies (Microgobius
gulosus, Gobiosoma robustum): influence of structural
complexity, competitive interactions, and presence of a predator. Journal
of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 2003:125-137.
Schofield PJ. 2005. Predation vulnerability of two gobies (Microgobius
gulosus, Gobiosoma robustum) is not related to presence of
seagrass. Florida Scientist 68:25-34.
Smith, LL. 1997. National Audobon Society Field Guide to Tropical Marine
Fishes. Alfred A Knopf. New York. p. 615.
Springer VG and KD Woodburn. 1960. An ecological study of the fishes of the
Tampa Bay Area. Professional Papers of the Florida State Board of
Conservation Marine Laboratory 1:1-104.
Thayer GW, Powell AB, and DE Hoss. 1999. Composition of larval, juvenile,
and small adult fishes relative to changes in environmental conditions in
Florida Bay. Estuaries 22:518-533
Tolan JM, Holt SA, and CP Onuf. 1997. Distribution and community structure
of ichthyoplankton in Laguna Madre seagrass meadows: Potential impact of
seagrass species change. Estuaries 20:450-464.