|
Species Description:
The red grouper, Epinephelus morio, is a moderately sized, robust grouper
that grows to approximately 125 cm (4.1 feet) and may weigh 23 kg (50.7 pounds)
or more. Most, however, do not achieve this size. Body depth is less than
head length. Eyes are large, and the nostrils are unequal in size, with the
posterior pair slightly larger than the anterior pair. The preopercule has
somewhat enlarged serrae present on the angle. The opercule has a straight
upper edge and 3 flat spines, with the center spine being the most elongate.
There are 15-16 gill rakers on the lower limb of gill arch. Scales are small
and ctenoid, numbering 60-68 along the lateral line. The dorsal fin has 11
spines, the second of which is the longest. The soft dorsal has 16-17 soft
rays. The interspinous membrane is not notched. The anal fin has 3 spines and
8-10 soft rays. The pelvic fins are shorter than the pectoral fins. The bases
of soft dorsal and anal fins have scales and thicker skin. The caudal peducle
lacks a saddle. The caudal fin is truncate. Body color is highly variable, but
typical color is dark red to reddish brown, fading to pink or lighter red on the
sides and ventral surface. Whitish spots and blotches are scattered over the
body surface, with small black dots around the eyes. The dorsal, anal, and
caudal fins all have dark outer margins. When resting, the color pattern may
become banded, as occurs in the Nassau grouper, E. striatus (Bohlke and
Chaplin 1964; Fischer 1978).
Potentially Misidentified Species:
The red grouper is distinguished from other members of its genus by the
second dorsal spine, which is the longest; and by the interspinous
membrane, which is not notched as it is in other Epinephelus
species. Further, the pelvic fins in the red grouper are shorter than the
pectorals and are inserted posterior to the pectoral fin base. The
opposite condition is true for the Warsaw grouper, E. nigritus; the
yellowedge grouper, E. flavolimbatus; and the misty grouper, E.
mystacinus; all of which have longer pelvic fins than pectoral fins,
and have the pelvic fins inserted anterior to the pectoral fin base.
Red groupers are distinguished from members of the Mycteroperca by
having a shorter body, 11 dorsal spines, 9 soft rays on the anal fin, and
by thicker skin at the bases of the dorsal and anal fins (Fischer 1978).
II. HABITAT AND
DISTRIBUTION
Regional Occurrence:
Ephinephelus morio ranges from New England south
through Bermuda, Florida, the Gulf of Mexico,
the Bahamas and the Caribbean, to southeastern Brazil
(Bohlke and Chaplin 1968, Fischer 1978). Occurrences of this species north of
the Carolinas are thought to be due to larval transport in the
Gulf Stream rather than from immigration of adults (Thompson and Munro 1978).
Primarily a continental
species, E. morio has the widest distribution of all western Atlantic
groupers (Roe 1976). Its center of abundance extends from the Florida shelf
into the eastern Gulf of Mexico (Moe 1969). It becomes more rare in the West
Indies (Randall 1968).
IRL Distribution:
While juveniles are common inhabitants of seagrasses and shallow reef areas in
south Florida, they occur less often inside the IRL. Fish less than 6 years old
can be found in nearshore reefs. Adults occur in offshore hardbottom habitats,
where they are harvested commercially and recreationally.
III. LIFE HISTORY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY
Age, Size, Lifespan:
Red grouper grow to 125 cm (4.1 feet) total length (TL) and may weigh 23 kg
(50.7 pounds), though most are harvested at 70 – 72 cm (27.5 - 28.3 inches) TL (Jory
and Iversen 1989). Males and females grow at approximately similar rates,
though males tend to reach larger adult size (Jory and Iversen 1989). They may
live 30 years or more (Moe 1969; Beaumariage and Bullock 1976).
Moe reported that red
grouper grow at a rate of 5.8 - 10.3 mm (0.22 – 0.40 inches) per month.
Abundance:
Epinephelus morio is more abundant in the eastern
Gulf of Mexico and in south Florida than it is in east central Florida.
Reproduction:
Red grouper, like most serranid fishes, are protogynous hermaphrodites,
beginning life as females, with some later transforming into males.
Females mature at approximately 35 – 50 cm Standard length (SL), at about
4-6 years of age (Heemstra and Randall 1993), but reach their greatest
reproductive potential when they are 8-12 years of age.
Females transform to males between ages 7-14, at a rate of approximately
15% per year. Transition to male can occur when females reach 27 cm (10.6
inches) SL, but most commonly occurs after females grow to 50 cm (19.7
inches) SL (Jory and Iversen 1989). Males comprise approximately 10% of
all year classes until approximately age 9 when males reach 50 cm (19.7
inches) SL. Sex ratios are not equal until approximately age 15, when
most red groupers have reached 63 cm (24.8 inches) SL (Moe 1969;
Beaumariage and Bullock 1976; Jory and Iversen 1989).
In the eastern Gulf of Mexico, spawning occurs from January through June,
peaking in March and May in waters 19 – 21 ºC, and 20-90 m deep (Roe 1969;
Johnson et al. 1998). Females with oocytes in varying stages of
development are collected throughout the spawning season, suggesting that
red grouper are likely to be batch spawners.
Female fecundity ranges from 312,000 – 5.7 million eggs per female,
depending on size (Moe 1969).
Embryology:
Ephinephelus morio eggs are pelagic, measuring less than 1mm in diameter and having a
single oil globule. Larval red grouper leave the plankton after
approximately 1 month and metamorphose to benthic juveniles when they
reach approximately 20-25 mm SL (Beaumariage and Bullock 1976).
IV. PHYSICAL TOLERANCES
Temperature:
Roe (1976) reported red grouper to a depth of 189 m, where bottom temperatures
ranged from 15 – 30 ºC.
Other Physical Tolerances:
Stout (1980) reported that red grouper in the
southeastern United States had an average of 0.0008 ppm DDT, and
undetectable levels of PCB’s compared to other fishes.
V. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY
Trophic Mode:
All groupers are unspecialized and opportunistic in their feeding habits. Red
grouper are among the top predators in reef community food webs and may control
some aspects of community balance in reef systems (May et al. 1979). The diet
is varied but commonly includes lutjanid and sparid fishes, as well as many
types of invertebrates including xanthid and portunid crabs, spiny lobster,
snapping shrimp, stomatopods, octopus, and squid and penaeid shrimp, especially
the pink shrimp (Penaeus duorarum) (Longley and Hildebrand 1941; Moe
1969; Costello and Allen 1970).
Red grouper are highly
susceptible to the effects of red tide organisms, and were extirpated from reefs
12-15 m off Sarasota, Florida in 1991 as the result of red tide poisoning (Heemstra
and Randall 1993).
Competitors:
Groupers likely compete interspecifically due to overlapping food habits, space
and habitat requirements (Thompson and Munro 1978). Groupers are also likely to
compete for prey with other large species such as jacks, snappers, barracuda,
and sharks.
Predators:
Predators of smaller groupers include other groupers and moray eels
Larger groupers are likely preyed upon by sharks, among them the sandbar
shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus; and the great hammerhead, Sphryna
mokarran (Compagno 1984).
Parasites:
Groupers suffer from a number of parasites
including digenetic trematodes, cestodes, and nematodes (Manter 1947;
Overstreet 1968; Fajer et al. 1979). Trematodes parasites include
Helicometra, Lepidapedon, and Stephanostomum species. Other
parasites that infect red grouper include the cestode
Callotetrarhynchus sp., and nematodes such as Anasakis sp. (Manter
1947).
Habitats:
Epinephelus
morio is a
reef-associated, non migratory species that occurs in low numbers
and can be found in depths of 5 - 300m (Jory and Iversen 1989; Heemstra
and Randall 1993). Young juveniles are commonly encountered in seagrass
beds less than 15m deep (Smith 1971) in south Florida. Older juveniles
occupy shallower water in hard bottom and reef habitats approximately 36 m
deep. Immature fishes 1 – 6 years old and measuring less than 50 cm SL
utilize nearshore reefs (Beaumariage and Bullock 1976). Adults occur
primarily over rocky and muddy bottoms (Fischer 1978), on limestone
ledges, wrecks, and caves, but are relatively uncommon on coral reefs.
Moe (1969) reported that red grouper in the eastern Gulf of Mexico
typically rest on the benthos, concealed in rocks, crevasses, or caverns,
and are found from 3 – 122 m deep.
Moe (1969) summarized movements of red groupers as they age: Early years
are lived in shallow estuarine or nearshore waters 3-18m deep. After
reaching 400-450 mm SL at 4-6 years of age, they leave nearshore reefs and
move to waters deeper than 36 m. This migration apparently coincides with
onset of sexual maturity.
VI. SPECIAL STATUS
Special Status:
None.
Fisheries Importance:
COMMERCIAL FISHERY:
The red grouper is both commercially and recreationally important
throughout its range, and is one of the most abundant grouper species in
southern Florida. Boats must be used by recreational anglers seeking red
grouper, as they are rarely caught from beaches and docks (Jory and
Iversen 1989).
Approximately 99%
of the Florida harvest of red grouper is taken in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico on Florida’s west coast. Between
1987 - 2001, the commercial harvest of red grouper in Florida totaled 95.3
million pounds, and was valued at $164.8 million. Of this, just 628,465
pounds of red grouper, valued at $1.2 million was harvested on Florida's
east coast during this time period. Within
the 5 county area encompassing the IRL (Volusia,
Brevard, Indian River, St. Lucie and Martin Counties)
257,339 pounds of red grouper, 41% of the east coast
total, was commercially harvested This catch was valued at
approximately $465,435, and ranks the red grouper
forty-eighth in commercial value, and sixtieth in pounds harvested.
Figure 1 below shows the dollar
value of the red grouper fishery to IRL counties by year. The
commercial red grouper fishery ranged in value from a high of $60,458 in
1995 to a low of $3,622 in 1990. Volusia county accounted for 59% of
the catch, followed by Brevard (18%), St. Lucie (10%), Martin (8%) and
Indian River (5%) Counties.

Figure 1. Annual dollar value of the
commercial catch of red grouper to the 5-county
area of the Indian River
Lagoon.

Figure 2. Total red grouper
dollar value and percentage by county for the years 1987 -
2001.
|
|
VOLUSIA |
BREVARD |
INDIAN |
ST. |
MARTIN |
TOTAL |
|
RIVER |
LUCIE |
| |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Value |
|
YEAR |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
to IRL |
|
1987 |
$203 |
$1,940 |
$363 |
$2,402 |
$8,800 |
$13,708 |
|
1988 |
$706 |
$11,585 |
$574 |
$14,006 |
$11,019 |
$37,890 |
|
1989 |
$347 |
$2,436 |
$103 |
$4,216 |
$1,740 |
$8,842 |
|
1990 |
$511 |
$806 |
$529 |
$1,313 |
$463 |
$3,622 |
|
1991 |
$542 |
$1,030 |
$1,166 |
$7,395 |
$12,232 |
$22,365 |
|
1992 |
$761 |
$4,039 |
$751 |
$5,134 |
$27,029 |
$37,714 |
|
1993 |
$953 |
$2,183 |
$1,337 |
$3,606 |
$26,163 |
$34,242 |
|
1994 |
$757 |
$3,330 |
$1,719 |
$3,068 |
$30,600 |
$39,474 |
|
1995 |
$3,037 |
$3,958 |
$2,947 |
$6,000 |
$44,516 |
$60,458 |
|
1996 |
$2,495 |
$2,721 |
$1,907 |
$2,832 |
$18,244 |
$28,199 |
|
1997 |
$2,485 |
$3,754 |
$2,441 |
$9,792 |
$17,327 |
$35,799 |
|
1998 |
$6,369 |
$2,917 |
$4,692 |
$6,429 |
$31,802 |
$52,209 |
|
1999 |
$11,866 |
$737 |
$3,534 |
$8,315 |
$12,671 |
$37,123 |
|
2000 |
$5,156 |
$2,187 |
$1,843 |
$4,725 |
$21,762 |
$35,673 |
|
2001 |
$1,376 |
$1,838 |
$1,138 |
$5,012 |
$8,753 |
$18,117 |
|
Cumulative Totals: |
$37,564 |
$45,461 |
$25,044 |
$84,245 |
$273,121 |
$465,435 |
Table 1. Total dollar value of
IRL red grouper, Epinephelus morio, between
1987 -
2001.
|
|
VOLUSIA |
BREVARD |
INDIAN |
ST. |
MARTIN |
|
RIVER |
LUCIE |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
YEAR |
Total |
Total |
Total |
Total |
Total |
|
1987 |
1.48% |
14.15% |
2.65% |
17.52% |
64.20% |
|
1988 |
1.86% |
30.58% |
1.51% |
36.96% |
29.08% |
|
1989 |
3.92% |
27.55% |
1.16% |
47.68% |
19.68% |
|
1990 |
14.11% |
22.25% |
14.61% |
36.25% |
12.78% |
|
1991 |
2.42% |
4.61% |
5.21% |
33.07% |
54.69% |
|
1992 |
2.02% |
10.71% |
1.99% |
13.61% |
71.67% |
|
1993 |
2.78% |
6.38% |
3.90% |
10.53% |
76.41% |
|
1994 |
1.92% |
8.44% |
4.35% |
7.77% |
77.52% |
|
1995 |
5.02% |
6.55% |
4.87% |
9.92% |
73.63% |
|
1996 |
8.85% |
9.65% |
6.76% |
10.04% |
64.70% |
|
1997 |
6.94% |
10.49% |
6.82% |
27.35% |
48.40% |
|
1998 |
12.20% |
5.59% |
8.99% |
12.31% |
60.91% |
|
1999 |
31.96% |
1.99% |
9.52% |
22.40% |
34.13% |
|
2000 |
14.45% |
6.13% |
5.17% |
13.25% |
61.00% |
|
2001 |
7.60% |
10.15% |
6.28% |
27.66% |
48.31% |
Table 2. By-county annual and cumulative percentages of the
red grouper
harvest for the years 1987-2001.
|
|
Volusia |
Brevard |
Indian River |
St. Lucie |
Martin |
|
Dollars |
$273,121 |
$84,245 |
$25,044 |
$45,461 |
$37,564 |
|
% |
58.7% |
18.1% |
5.4% |
9.8% |
8.1% |
Table 3. By-county cumulative dollar value and percentage of total
for the red
grouper
harvest from 1987 - 2001.
RECREATIONAL FISHERY:
Within the
5-county area of the Indian River Lagoon, recreational anglers captured 96,813
red grouper (Table 4). Figure 3 below shows the annual
recreational landings of red grouper between 1997 - 2004. The bulk of the
recreational catch (65.3%) is taken in waters 3 - 200 miles offshore.
Approximately 27.8% of the recreational catch is harvested from the shoreline to
3 miles offshore. Anglers fishing inland waters other than the Indian
River Lagoon accounted for 4.0% of the harvest, while those fishing within
the confines of the IRL accounted for only 2.9% of the total.

Figure 3. Survey data for the
common snook
recreational fishery showing the number of
fishes
harvested in East Florida waters from 1997 - 2004.

Figure 4. Summary of the
common snook
recreational harvest and percentage of total by
area from 1997 -
2004.
|
|
To 3
Miles |
To 200
Miles |
Other
Inland |
IRL |
TOTAL |
|
1997 |
2,296 |
10,439 |
1,156 |
|
13,891 |
|
1998 |
1,898 |
15,960 |
540 |
|
18,398 |
|
1999 |
3,517 |
5,082 |
772 |
266 |
9,637 |
|
2000 |
3,773 |
6,822 |
|
888 |
11,482 |
|
2001 |
4,341 |
5,398 |
|
|
9,739 |
|
2002 |
3,710 |
7,968 |
292 |
625 |
12,595 |
|
2003 |
1,674 |
6,791 |
1,065 |
1,052 |
10,582 |
|
2004 |
5,684 |
4,805 |
|
|
10,489 |
|
Total: |
26,893 |
63,265 |
3,825 |
2,831 |
96,813 |
Table
4. Summary data for the red grouper, Epinephalus morio,
recreational
fishery in Eastern Florida waters from 1997 - 2004. Data provided by
National Marine Fisheries Service, Fisheries Statistics Division, NOAA.
|
|
To 3 |
To 200 Miles |
Other E. FL Inland |
IRL |
|
Miles |
|
|
% Total |
% Total |
% Total |
% Total |
|
1997 |
16.5% |
75.1% |
8.3% |
0.0% |
|
1998 |
10.3% |
86.7% |
2.9% |
0.0% |
|
1999 |
36.5% |
52.7% |
8.0% |
2.8% |
|
2000 |
32.9% |
59.4% |
0.0% |
7.7% |
|
2001 |
44.6% |
55.4% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
2002 |
29.5% |
63.3% |
2.3% |
5.0% |
|
2003 |
15.8% |
64.2% |
10.1% |
9.9% |
|
2004 |
54.2% |
45.8% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Table 5. By-county annual and cumulative percentages of the red grouper
harvest for the years 1997 - 2001.
Data provided by National
Marine Fisheries Service, Fisheries Statistics Division, NOAA.
|
|
To 3 Miles |
To 200 Miles |
Other Inland |
IRL |
|
No. Fish |
26,893 |
63,265 |
3,825 |
2,831 |
|
% |
27.78% |
65.35% |
3.95% |
2.92% |
Table
6. Summary of the red grouper recreational harvest and percentage
of total fish captured in each area from 1997 - 2004. Data
provided
by National Marine Fisheries Service, Fisheries Statistics
Division,
NOAA.
VII. REFERENCES
Beaumariage, D.S., and L.H. Bullock. 1976. Biological research on snappers
and groupers as related to fishery management
requirements. Pages 86-94 in
H.R. Bullis and A.C. Jones, eds. Proceedings:
colloquium on snapper-grouper
fishery resources of the western central Atlantic
Ocean. Fla. Sea Grant
Rep. 17.
Bohlke, J.E., and C.C.G. Chaplin. 1968. Fishes of the Bahamas and adjacent
waters. Livingston Publishing Company, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania. 771 p.
Brulé, T. and L.G. Rodriguez Canche, 1993 Food habits of juvenile red
groupers,
Epinephelus morio (Valenciennes, 1828), from Campeche
Bank, Yucatan,
Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 52(2):772-779.
Brule, T., D, Ordaz Avila, M. Sanchez Crespo, and C. Deniel. 1994.
Seasonal
and diel changes in diet composition of juvenile red
grouper (Epinephelus
morio) from Campeche Bank. Bull. Mar. Sci.
55:255-262.
Brule, T., C. Deniel, M.T. Colas and C.M. Sanchez, 1999 Red grouper in the
southern Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.
128(3):385-402.
Brulé, T., C. Déniel, T. Colás-Merrufo and M. Sánchez-Crespo, 1999 Red
grouper reproduction in southern Gulf of Mexico. Trans.
Am. Fish. Soc.
128(3):385-402.
Compagno, L.V.J. 1984. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 4: Sharks of the world.
An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark
species known to date. Part 2:
Carcharhiniformes. FAO Fish. Synop. (125) Vol. 4, Pt.2:
251-655.
Costello, T.J., and D.M. Allen. 1970. Synopsis of biological data on the
pink
shrimp, Penaeus duorarum duorarum Burkenroad, 1939. FAO
Fish. Rep.
57-4:1499-1537.
Fischer, W., ed. 1978. FAO species identification sheets for fishery
purposes.Western central Atlantic (fishing area 31). Vol. IV. Rome,
FAO.
Heemstra, P.C. and J.E. Randall, 1993. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 16.
Groupers of the world (family Serranidae, subfamily
Epinephelinae). An
annotated and illustrated catalogue of the grouper,
rockcod, hind, coral
grouper and lyretail species known to date.. FAO Fish.
Synop. 125(16):
382 p.
International Game Fish Association, 1991 World record game fishes.
International Game Fish Association, Florida, USA.
Johnson, A.K., P. Thomas, and R.R. Wilson. 1998. Seasonal cycles of
gonadal
development and plasma sex steroid levels in
Epinephelus morio, a
protogynous grouper in the eastern Gulf of Mexico.
Journal of Fish Biology
52:502–518.
Johnson, A.G. and L.A. Collins, 1994 Age-size structure of red grouper,
(Epinephelus morio), from the eastern Gulf of Mexico.
N.E. Gulf Sci.
13(2):101-106.
Johnson,
G.D., and P. Keener. 1984. Aid to identification of grouper larvae. Bull.
Mar. Sci. 34(1):106-134.
Jory, D.E., and E.S. Iversen. 1989. Species profiles: life histories and
environmental requirements of coastal fishes and
invertebrates (south Florida) -
black, red, and Nassau groupers. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv.
Biol. Rep.
82(11.110). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82-4.
21 pp.
Longley, W.H., and S.F. Hildebrand. 1941. Systematic catalogue of the
fishes of
Tortugas, Florida, with observations on
colour, habits and local distributions.
Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pap. Tortugas Lab. 34. 331 pp.
Overstreet, R.M. 1968. Digenetic trematodes of marine teleost fishes from
Biscayne Bay, Florida. Unpubl. Ph.D. Dissertation.
University of Miami, Coral
Gables, Fla. 188 pp.
Manooch, C.S., 1987 Age and growth of snappers and groupers. p. 329-373.
In
J.J. Polovina and S. Ralston (eds.) Tropical snappers and groupers: biology
and fisheries management. Ocean Resour. Mar. Policy
Ser. Westview Press,
Inc., Boulder and
London.
Manter, H.W. 1947. The digenetic trematodes of marine fishes of Tortugas,
Florida. Am. Midl. Nat. 38(2): 257-416.
Manter, H.W. 1947. The digenetic trematodes of marine fishes of Tortugas,
Florida. Am. Midl. Nat. 38(2): 257-416.
May, R.M., J.R. Beddington, C.W. Clark, S.J. Holt, and R.M. Laws. 1979.
Management of multispecies fisheries. Science
205:267-277.
Moe, M.A., Jr. 1969. Biology of the red grouper (Epinephelus morio
Valenciennes) from the eastern Gulf of Mexico.
Prof. Pap. Ser. Mar. Lab.
Fla. No. 10. 95 pp.
Randall, J.E. 1967. Food habits of reef fishes of the West Indies. Stud.
Trop.
Oceanogr. Univ. Miami 5:665-847.
Randall, J.E. 1968. Caribbean reef fishes. TFH Publications,
Jersey City, New
Jersey. 18 pp.
Rivas, L.R. 1964. Western Atlantic serranid fishes (groupers) of the genus
Epinephelus. Q. J. Fla. Acad. Sci. 27(1):17-30.
Roe, R.B. 1976. Distributions of snappers and groupers in the Gulf of
Mexico as
determined from exploratory fishing data. Pages 129-164
in: H. R. Bullis and
A.C. Jones, eds. Proceedings: colloquium
snapper-grouper fishery resources
of the western central Atlantic Ocean. Fla. Sea Grant Rep. 17.
Smith, C.L. 1961. Synopsis of biological data on groupers (Epinephelus and
allied
genera) of the western North Atlantic. FAO Fish. Biol.
Synop. No. 23. 61 pp.
Stiles, T.C. and M.L. Burton, 2000 Age, growth and mortality of red
grouper,
Epinephelus morio, from the southeastern United States.
p. 123-137. In:
Proceedings of the 43rd Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries
Institute.
Stout, V.F. 1980. Organo-chlorine residues in fishes from the northeast
Atlantic
Ocean and Gulf of Mexico. U.S. Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv.
Fish. Bull. 78:51-58.
Thompson, R., and J.L. Munro. 1978. Aspects of the biology and ecology of
Caribbean reef fishes: Serranidae (hinds and groupers). J. Fish Biol. 12:115-
146.
Thompson, R. and J.L. Munro, 1983 The biology, ecology and bionomics of
the
hinds and groupers, Serranidae. p. 59-81. In: J.L.
Munro (ed.) Caribbean
coral reef fishery resources. ICLARM Stud. Rev. 7.
Report by: K. Hill,
Smithsonian Marine Station
Submit additional information, photos or comments to:
irl_webmaster@si.edu
Page last updated: July 15, 2005 |