|
| |
|
Non-Native and Invasive Species
|
Non-native species are species that have been
introduced into new areas that have not historically been part of their native
range. 'Exotic,' 'alien,' 'nonindigenous,' and 'introduced' are all
synonymous terms referring to non-native species. In contrast, native species are species that have historically occurred as part of an
ecosystem in a specific location. Native species are also called indigenous
species. Introduction is defined by
Krueger and May (1991) as the transfer by humans of an organism outside its
native range.
Plants and animals have been transported by humans and introduced into new
areas for many centuries. Some of these introductions have been intentional,
although a great many have not. Intentional introductions are often for
purposes of livestock or agricultural production, e.g., introduction of domesticated cattle, goats, swine, and honeybees
from Europe to the New World in centuries past.
Many intentional introductions of cultivated stocks and crops have, of course,
been of great economic benefit. Hundreds of
nonindigenous plants and animals have been introduced to Florida in the five centuries
since the arrival of the first European settlers and many of these have greatly
benefited man. For example, the cultivated plants of genus Citrus
originated in tropical to subtropical southeast Asia, India, and the Near East
and were introduced to Florida and the New World by Spanish explorer Ponce de
Leon in 1513. The various modern hybrid citrus cultivars-including the
world-famous "Indian River Citrus" varieties-now represent a billion-dollar
industry in the state.
Unfortunately, not all species introductions have proven beneficial.
Whether intentionally released to the environment, intentionally introduced and
then accidentally released, or introduced entirely by accident, the negative
ecological and economic impacts of exotic species introduction are substantial.
Very often, the invaders go largely unnoticed until populations have grown and
spread to a point where eradication is difficult and costly, or even
impossible. The most infamous such invasion in recent memory in North America
is that of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the Great Lakes. In
Florida, the introduction and spread of the green mussel (Perna viridis) in
Tampa Bay is a prime example of an exotic introduction that has had substantial
ecological and economic impacts.
What Makes a Successful Invader?
Exotic species have the potential to become invasive when they are released
into a new environment. Invasive nonindigenous species are those species whose
introduction causes, or is likely to cause, significant economic or environmental
harm. Not all non-native species become invasive when released to novel
systems. In fact, the majority of individual introduction events are believed
to be of little consequence, with the introduced individuals failing to lead to
established populations. In other cases, the introduced species does become
established but, for reasons not entirely understood, its presence causes
little or no ecological or economic impact.
Nevertheless, any species removed from its native range and introduced to a new
area has the potential to become an invasive species. The newly-introduced
organisms now exist free from the natural forces that keep populations in check
within their native range. Such natural forces include predators, competitors,
parasites, and diseases that the species co-evolved with, as well as
environmental factors and other natural control mechanisms (Torchin et al.
2003, Wolfe 2002). When an introduced species is released from these controls,
populations may become established and to grow unchecked to the
point where they achieve invasive species status. When this occurs, unchecked
invasive populations may compete with or otherwise negatively impact native
populations, displacing them in some instances.
There are certain biological traits that together determine the capacity for a
non-native organism to become invasive. Organisms with wide habitat and/or
dietary preferences, broad physiological tolerances across a range of
environmental conditions, and relatively short generation times may be
predisposed to become successful invasives. Organisms that are abundant (but not
rampant) over large portions of their native ranges and those with a high degree
of genetic variability may also become successful invasives on release to novel
environments (Erlich 1989, Williams and Meffe 1999).
The ability to act as a pioneering species-among the earliest to occupy
available ecological niches and to establish 'founder' populations-is another
trait shared by several successful invasive species. These organisms typically
exhibit high fecundity such that release of only a few individuals can give
rise to a population sizeable enough to establish itself in its new setting.
It is important to bear in mind that although we can recognize many of the
traits that allow introduced species to become invasive, predicting which
species actually will become invasive in a new setting remains difficult.
This is a key reason why the intentional introduction of non-native species,
either for commercial purposes or as a means of biocontrol to manage other
ecological invaders, is undertaken only after years of careful study has
shown the invasive potential for the new species to be minimal.
Although predicting which introduced species will eventually become invasive is
difficult, identifying the sorts of habitats most likely to be invaded is
somewhat less so. Habitats most susceptible to invasion tend to have low
natural biological diversity, simple food webs, and a degree of vulnerability
to natural or man-made disturbance (Williams and Meffe 1999, Ray 2005).
Agricultural lands, managed forests, and variously urbanized habitats all share
the above traits, and all are susceptible to exotic invasion. But sheltered
coastlines and estuaries are also vulnerable to invasion, and these systems
also tend to have a relatively low diversity and usually suffer from
anthropogenic disturbance (Ray 2005).
Florida and the Indian River Lagoon
Florida is one of the two states most affected by invasive species, second only
to Hawaii. Both states share features that make them particularly susceptible
to bioinvasion.
Simberloff (1986, 1997) notes that two sorts of sites particularly prone to
invasion impacts are islands and habitats created or greatly disturbed by
humans. Hawaii, an oceanic island archipelago whose lowlands are heavily
impacted by human disturbance and development, contains an abundance of both
types of sites. The situation in Florida is strikingly similar. South Florida
is effectively a habitat island, bounded to the east, south, and west by ocean,
and on to the north by winter low temperatures. Like true oceanic islands, the
habitats of south Florida are typified by an impoverished native flora and
fauna which leaves them vulnerable to negative impacts from invasive
populations (Myers and Ewel 1990). With a resident population of 17 million
people and growing, and several times that number visiting each year, much of
Florida is dominated by habitats created or extensively modified by humans.
Also similar to
Hawaii, large expanses of tropical to subtropical habitats add to Florida's
vulnerability to invasive species impact. The subtropical to tropical climate
and the high seasonal rainfall are two climatological factors that
foster the establishment of tropical nonindigenous species, particularly
terrestrial plants (McCann et al. 1996).
Large numbers of tropical exotic species were first introduced to the state as
ornamental plants or pets. Accidental or intentional release of these
organisms to adjacent ecologically accommodating natural areas in south Florida
gives them a foot in the door toward establishing self-sustaining populations.
South Florida is more susceptible to invasion than north Florida, and the
effects of invasion are more apparent. In fact, many south Florida invasive
populations have a distribution whose northern extent terminates abruptly at
approximately the latitude where winter freeze events are commonly recorded
(Simberloff 1997).
Another factor contributing to the invasive exotic crisis in Florida is the
fact that the state is an important transportation and shipping hub. Fully 85%
of the hundreds of millions of live plants imported to the U.S. utilized Miami
as the port of entry (Simberloff 1997). Most of the exotic animals shipped to
the U.S. for the pet trade also pass through Florida.
Certainly, the vast Florida coastline, at almost 3,000 km, offers marine
invaders ample opportunity to gain a foothold in coastal and inshore habitats.
Finally, seasonal tropical storms common to Florida can facilite the spread of
exotics in the state by physically dispersing individuals or propagules (McCann
et al. 1996).
Noted entomologist and conservation biologist E. O. Wilson, in his foreword to
the book, Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous
Species in Florida, eloquently summed up the invasion status of the state
and what is at stake:
What is being lost? The answer is easy. A precious and irreplaceable part of
Florida's, and the nation's, heritage is disappearing. Plants, animals, and
entire ecosystems that took tens of thousands to millions of years to evolve
are at risk. What is being gained in their place? A hodgepodge of species
found in other parts of the world, in some cases all around the world in
tropical and subtropical environments. . . . Florida is being homogenized, and
everyone, for all time to come, will be the poorer for it.
Turning attention specifically to the Indian River Lagoon (IRL) region of
east-central Florida, a number of features leave the system vulnerable to
exotic invasion. The long and narrow coastal IRL straddles climatic provinces
(subtropical to warm-temperate) and also straddles land and sea. Open
communication with the Atlantic Ocean occurs via five inlets that cut through
the barrier island, while an extensive network of canals drains upland portions
of the watershed into the lagoon. At a glance, then, it is apparent that the
IRL and its watershed offer would-be invaders a broad range of environmental
conditions as well as means of entry, whether by land, surface water, or sea.
Beyond these geographical considerations, the IRL is an urbanized estuary
situated on the densely populated Florida east coast. Recall that human
disturbance typically predisposes an area to bioinvasion.
We need also consider the mix of regional commercial land uses (e.g.,
agriculture, ornamental aquaculture), and outdoor recreational activities
(e.g., fishing and boating) that have the potential to act as vectors for the
introduction of new species. Consider the ease with which recreational boaters
can transport marine invaders large distances when they trailer boats up and
down the coast or between Florida's Gulf and Atlantic coasts.
With the above considerations in mind, it can only be assumed that unintentional new
species introductions are occurring all the time in the IRL watershed and are a
very real and ongoing threat to ecosystem structure and function.
By Land and By Sea: Introduction Pathways
Several known or suspected non-native species introduction pathways are
described here, and some of the species likely to have been transported via
each pathway are noted. The actual invasion pathways for
many nonindigenous species remain unknown and that species are likely to
have arrived via a number of different pathways and multiple introduction
events. Additionally, the original native range of many species is not known
with certainty. Species with unknown geographical origins are often referred
to as 'cryptogenic' species.
Intentional release for human benefit
A number of nonindigenous plants and animals have been directly introduced into
new locations in order to derive some benefit resulting from the introduction.
The widespread introduction of the Asian oyster (Crassostrea gigas) throughout
much of the world in an effort to augment or replace depleted native species
fisheries is a well-known marine example of such an introduction. Introduction
of European brown trout (Salmo trutta) to new locations in order to establish
sport fisheries is a freshwater example. The honeybees (Apis mellifera) that
are of nearly incalculable economic and agricultural value in Florida and
elsewhere in the U.S. are descended from European honeybees brought to the New
World some 300 ago.
Several examples from the Indian River Lagoon region of Florida are of note as
well. The introduction of torpedo grass (Panicum repens) in the late 19th century
was as a cattle forage grass. Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia) was
introduced in the late 19th century partly for use as a windbreak to border
agricultural groves. Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) was
introduced to Florida on several occasions and for multiple purposes, including
wood production, soil stabilization, and to form forests intended to dry up the
Everglades and other wetland ecosystems. In Florida, as elsewhere, release of
the marine toad (Bufo marinus) was
intended as a means of controlling populations of crop-damaging insects.
Accidental escape from captive cultivation
Often, non-native organisms are intentionally introduced to new regions so they
may be cultivated under captive conditions and subsequent release to the
environment is due to accident or carelessness.
For example, a number of
exotic species now established in the IRL region of Florida were accidentally
released by the aquarium trade. This list includes walking catfish (Clarias
batrachus), blackchin tilapia (Sarotherodon
melanotheron), and the aquatic plant hydrilla (Hydrilla
verticillata). Pet escapes are likewise responsible for the presence
of feral house cats (Felis catus)
and green iguanas (Iguana
iguana) in Florida.
Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) is possibly the best-known Florida
example of an ornamental plant whose escape from controlled cultivation has had
devastating ecological and economic effects in the state. Among the most
ecologically damaging accidental domesticated animal releases in the southern
U.S. is the release and subsequent establishment of feral pigs (Sus scrofa).
The species was also released in the U.S. in the form of European wild boars
intended for sport hunting, and today's U.S. feral pig populations are a
combination of both descendant lines.
Accidental transport in agricultural/commercial products
A great many non-native species are transported to new locations as undetected
infestations or stowaways in commercial agriculture shipments and subsequently
released to the environment.
Cuban treefrogs (Osteopilus septentrionalis), for example, were most likely
introduced to Florida as undetected stowaways in vegetables imported from Cuba
(Behler 1979) while the cactus moth (Cactoblastis cactorum) may have been
brought to Florida unnoticed in infected prickly pear nursery stock. Red
imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta), a species that has become a scourge in
the southern U.S., may have been accidentally transported here in the 1920s in
shipments of potted live South American plants.
Analogous introductions in marine environments can be found as well. The
non-native ranges of animals like green porcelain crabs, serrated swimming crabs
(Petrolisthes armatus, Scylla serrata) and other exotic marine species have very
likely been expanded as these organisms have been accidentally transported in
live shipments of oysters, mussels, and other aquacultured or wild-harvested marine products.
Unintentional transport as ship hull fouling
The majority of marine and estuarine introductions are related to overseas
transport and shipping, and this has likely been the case since the dawn of
maritime navigation.
The current circumglobal distributions of the
surface-fouling pleated sea squirt (Styela plicata) and wood-boring species
like shipworms (e.g., Teredo navalis) and boring isopods (e.g., Sphaeroma
terebrans) are almost certainly reflective of a long human history of
aiding-and-abetting marine exotic introductions that includes several hundred
years of wooden sailing fleets moving goods, people, and accidental hitchhikers
across vast ocean basins.
Historically then, ship surface fouling has been a significant vector for
non-native marine species introduction. Today as well, species like barnacles
(e.g., Balanus amphitrite) and sea squirts that are capable of attaching to
hard surfaces are still transported on ship hulls, and also on buoys, service
barges, anchors, chains, ropes, etc. (Carlton and Hodder 1995, Carlton 2001).
Unintentional transport in ship ballast
Ballast refers to any heavy material used to improve
stability and control of a vessel. In a cargo
vessel laden with goods, most of the ballast is provided by the cargo stowed in
the hold. When the cargo is offloaded, however, an equivalent mass of some
other material must be taken on to maintain stability. Prior to the 1880s,
rocks, sand, dirt, or other forms of 'dry ballast' were typically employed, but
for well over a century seawater has been primarily used as ballast.
Several centuries of transporting dry ballast across and between oceans spread
innumerable species of insects, wharf roaches (Ligia exotica),
desiccation-resistant marine invertebrates like barnacles, plants, and other
organisms between the world's harbors and surrounding environs (Carlton and
Hodder 1995).
Ballast water pumped into a ship's hold at one location will contain adult-,
larval-, and propagule forms of a variety of water column and
sediment-associated organisms occurring in that location. When that ballast
water is pumped out at a new location perhaps several-thousand miles away, an
undetermined number of viable exotic organisms are pumped out as well. Ballast
water is the most important man-made, long range transport vector for marine
plankton, including the free-swimming planktonic larval stages of organisms
that as adults inhabit hardbottom and soft sediment intertidal and subtidal
communities.
The majority of new shipping-related marine exotic introductions are believed
to come from ballast water (Lavoie et al. 1999, Ray 2005). Of the marine and
estuarine bioinvaders now found in the IRL, species such as green mussels
(Perna viridis), charru mussels (Mytella charruana), striped barnacles,
green porcelain crabs (Petrolisthes armatus), serrated swimming crabs (Scylla
serrata), and several others were likely introduced to U.S. waters as larval
forms transported in ballast water.
The Eurasian zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), noted previously, appears to
have been introduced into the Great Lakes in the late 1980s as larvae
transported in ballast water and released from a Black Sea commercial cargo vessel.
D. polymorpha has flourished in the U.S. since its initial release, spreading
southward down the Mississippi River and in all of the major river drainages
east of the Rocky Mountains.
Natural range extension
Occasionally, an exotic species comes to occur in a new area not through any of
the human-facilitated introduction pathways described above, but through
natural range extension. The initial appearance in Florida of the highly
migratory cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis), native to Africa, appears to be a
largely natural occurrence unassisted by humans (Weber 1972, Kaufman 1996).
Similarly, the initial Florida panhandle population of nine-banded armadillos
(Dasypus novemcinctus) represented a natural westward range expansion of the
Texas armadillo population.
Although the initial occurrence of such animals in new areas may have taken place
in the absence of human helping hands, subsequent spread of these populations
may still be dependent on human activity. In the case of the cattle egret, for
example, range expansion in the U.S. subsequent to the arrival of the species
appears related to widespread landscape conversion to pasturelands (Telfair
1994).
Impacts and Consequences of Invasion
The ecological consequences of exotic species invasion are many and varied.
They include potential displacement of native species, modification of
community structure, alteration of food webs, and possible reduction in habitat
value. Invasive terrestrial plants may alter habitat hydrology and soil
make-up, and can affect natural fire regimes in fire-mediated ecosystems
(Mazzotti et al. 1997). Of utmost concern to conservation biologists is the
potential for loss of biological diversity when native species are outcompeted
by invasives and displaced from the ecosystems to which they may be uniquely
adapted.
Biological invasions carry serious economic and ecological consequences.
Nationwide, bioinvasions over the past two centuries have resulted in the
establishment of 50,000 foreign plant and animal species, with one of every
seven of these species becoming invasive. The United States Department of
Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has estimated the
national cost due to invasive species, including damage to crops and other
industries and the cost of management and control, at nearly $140 billion
annually (APHIS 2001).
Assessing the Invasion Status of the IRL Watershed
The efforts of the Indian River Lagoon Species Inventory Project authors during
the 2006-2007 funding cycle were primarily directed toward assessing the status
of the IRL region with regard to nonindigenous species. Each of the fifty new
species reports added to the inventory during this period summarizes the life
history, invasion history, and potential ecological and economic impacts of a
variety of non-native species occurring here and elsewhere in Florida.
Additionally, an initial atttempt was made to assess the native/non-native
status of the biota of the IRL region via examination of the relevant
literature and collection records. Though by no means exhaustive, this first
examination of the invasion status of the region identified approximately 240
species present in the region as either exotic or cryptogenic. Of these,
approximately 170 species represent organisms new to the Species Inventory.
These species are denoted in the Inventory index pages as being either
"Non-Native" or "Cryptogenic."
REFERENCES
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service. (2001). APHIS strategic plan 2000-2005.
Carlton J.T. 2001. Introduced species in U.S. coastal waters: Environmental impacts and management priorities. Pew
Oceans Commission. Arlington, VA.
Carlton J.T., and J. Hodder. 1995. Biogeography and dispersal of coastal marine
organisms: Experimental studies on a replica of a 16th century sailing vessel.
Marine Biology 121:721-730.
Erlich P.R. 1989. Attributes of Invaders and the Invading Processes:
Vertebrates. Pp 315-328 in: Drake J.A. (ed.) Biological Invasions: A global
Perspective. John Wiley and Sons, NY. 525 p.
Krueger C.C. and B. May. 1991. Ecological and genetic effects of
salmonid introductions in North America. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 48(Suppl. 1):66-77.
Lavoie D.M., Smith, L.D., and G.M. Ruiz. 1999. The potential for intracoastal
transfer of nonindigenous species in the ballast water of ships. Estuarine,
Coastal and Shelf Science 48:551-654.
Mazzotti F.J., Center T.D., Dray F.A., and D. Thayer. 1997. Ecological
consequences of invasion by Melaleuca quinquenervia in South Florida
Wetlands: Paradise Damaged, not Lost. UF/IFAS document SSWEC123. Available online.
McCann J.A., Arkin L.N., and J.D. Williams. 1996. Nonindigenous aquatic and
selected terrestrial species of Florida: Status, pathway and time of
introduction, present distribution, and significant ecological and economic
effects. Available online.
Myers R.L., and J.J. Ewel (eds.). 1990. Ecosystems of Florida. University of
Central Florida Press, Orlando. 765 p.
Ray G.L. 2005. Invasive animal species in marine and estuarine environments:
Biology and ecology. Aquatic Nuisance Species Research Program Technical Report
ERDC/EL TR-05-2, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg,
MS.
Simberloff D. 1986. Introduced insects: A biogeographic and systematic
perspective. In: Mooney H.A., and J.A. Drake (eds.). Ecology of Biological
Invasions of North America and Hawaii. 321 p.
Simberloff D. 1997. The biology of invasions. Pp 3-17 in: Simberloff D., Schmitz D.C., and T.C. Brown (eds.).
Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigneous Species in Florida. Island Press,
Washington, D.C. 467 p.
Torchin M.E., Lafferty K.D., Dobson A.P., McKensie, V.J., and A.M. Kuris. 2003.
Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 421:628-630.
Telfair R.C. II. 1994. Cattle Egret (Bubulcus ibis). In: Poole A.,a nd
Gill F. (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 113. Philadelphia: The Academy
of Natural Sciences; Washington, D.C.: The American Ornithologists' Union.
Williams J.D., and G.K. Meffe. 1999. Nonindigenous species: Status and trends
of the nationŐs biological resources. United States Geological Survey.
Wolfe L.M. 2002. Why alien invaders succeed: Support for the escape-from-enemy
hypothesis. American Naturalist 160:705-711.
Report by:
J. Masterson, Smithsonian Marine Station
Submit additional information, photos or comments
to:
irl_webmaster@si.edu
Page last updated: December 1, 2007 |
|