|
continuous, with 10 strong spines, the fifth of which is the longest,
and 12-14 soft rays. The anal fin has 3 spines and 8-9 rays, with the third
spine longer than the second. The caudal fin is long and deeply forked, with
the upper lobe longer then the lower. The pectoral fins are also long, reaching
to the anus. Scales are small and ctenoid, with 48-49 lateral line scales. In
profile, the dorsal area is only slightly elevated, with a slight curve between
the nape and the dorsal fin. The mouth is small in comparison with other
snappers and is set obliquely, with the lower jaw projecting beyond the upper.
The maxillary extends beyond the front of the orbit. The upper jaw and the
vomer each have a narrow band of villiform teeth, with the upper jaw also having
5-6 lateral canine teeth. The lower jaw has larger villiform teeth. The
preopercule is weakly serrated, and those at the angle are shallowly
emarginated. Body color is distinctive. The dorsal surface is bluish to olive
green in color, fading along the sides to white along the ventral surface. A
strong yellow stripe runs midlaterally along the sides, originating on the snout
and broadening as it runs the length of the body to the depth of the entire
caudal peduncle. Yellow spots pepper the upper body above the midlateral
stripe. The caudal fin is entirely yellow. The dorsal fin is yellow distally,
but pale at its base and anteriorly. All other fins are pale yellow or clear in
color (Bortone and Williams 1986).
II. HABITAT AND
DISTRIBUTION
Regional Occurrence:
In the Western Atlantic, Ocyurus chrysurus ranges from approximately
Massachusetts south to Brazil including
Bermuda, the Gulf of Mexico, West
Indies, and the Caribbean. It is most common from South
Florida through the Bahamas and Caribbean.
IRL Distribution:
Juveniles are common in inshore areas where they utilize seagrass beds as
nursery habitats. Adults are found within the IRL, especially near inlet areas,
however, they are more common in nearshore and offshore waters.
III. LIFE HISTORY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY
Age, Size, Lifespan:
Ocyurus chrysurus reaches a maximum size of 86.3 cm (33.9 inches) total length
(TL), and may weigh as much as 4.07 kg (8.9 pounds) (IGFA 2001). they are
reported to live 14 years or more.
Growth rates in
yellowtail snapper were reported by Thompson and Munro (1974) as 3.3 mm/month
(0.13 inches) based on back calculated lengths at mean annulus formation in
otoliths.
Reproduction:
Age at maturity is in question for many snapper species, with most authors
relating maturity to length. Ocyurus chrysurus males become mature at
approximately 26 cm (10.2 inches) fork length (FL), while females mature at 29
31cm (11.4 12.2 inches) FL (Thompson and Munro 1974). As with most snappers,
the yellowtail spawns offshore in groups (Wicklund 1969; Thompson and Munro
1974). The spawning season may be protracted, with seasonal peaks in activity
(Erdman 1976). Munro et al. (1973) reported ripe individuals from March through
May in nearshore waters off Jamaica, but noted that yellowtail spawn year-round
in offshore waters. Off Cuba, Piedra (1969) reported females were ripe between
March and August. Allen (1985) reported yellowtail snapper spawning from
April to August in the Florida Keys.
Fecundity was estimated
by Piedra (1969) as 99,660 1.5 million eggs per female for Ocyurus
chrysurus measuring between 292-382 mm (11.5 15.0 inches) FL.
Rodriguez-Pino 1961)
reported that Ocyurus chrysurus sometimes hybridizes with lane snapper,
Lutjanus synagris. They are also thought to hybridize with the dog
snapper, L. jocu (Jordan and Evermann 1898).
Embryology:
As with most snapper species, eggs are pelagic (Bortone and Williams 1986) and
hatch after approximately 20 hours.
IV. PHYSICAL TOLERANCES
Temperature:
Under laboratory conditions, the upper lethal temperature for Ocyurus
chrysurus was 33.5ē - 34.0ēC (Wallace 1977) with acclimation temperature not
appearing to have any effect on upper lethal limits.
V. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY
Trophic Mode:
Most snappers are classified as euryphagic carnivores (Bortone and Williams
1986). Ocyurus chrysurus differs somewhat in its feeding behavior from
other snappers because it tends to feed above the substratum more than do other
species. Randall (1967) reported adults eat crabs (23%), shrimp (16%), and
fishes (15.9%). Off Cuba, Piedra (1969) reported yellowtail stomach contents
included fish (82%), and shrimp (17%). Smaller fishes, crustaceans, marine
worms, gastropods, and cephalopods have also been reported in the diet (Allen
1985).
Predators:
Primary predators of snappers are sharks and other large predatory fishes
including other snappers (Bortone and Williams 1986).
Habitats:
Ocyurus chrysurus is typically found at water depths of 20-70 m (66 230 feet) depths
(Thompson and Munro 1974; Fischer 1978), but has been reported to depths from
0-180 m (0 590 feet). Juveniles utilize vegetated inshore waters in estuaries
and bays and are common in seagrass beds (Starck 1971; Bortone and Williams
1986). Adults generally form schools, but are less associated with hard-bottoms
than other snapper species (Randall 1967; Bortone and Williams 1986),
inhabiting patch reefs and along the outer edges of deeper coral and rock
reefs. Moe (1972) reported yellowtail snappers to be semipelagic wanderers over
reef habitats. Adults tend to remain in an area once they have become
established (Beaumariage 1969; Bortone and Williams 1986).
Activity Time:
Ocyurus chrysurus feeds primarily nocturnally (Bortone and Williams 1986).
VI. SPECIAL STATUS
Special Status:
None.
Fisheries Importance:
COMMERCIAL FISHERY:
The commercial fishery for yellowtail snapper is not especially valuable in east
central Florida, though it is considerably more valuable in south Florida where
average annual landings total over 1.7 million pounds and are valued at
approximately $3.5 million. Data from Florida Fish and Wildlife Research
Institute (FWRI) show that landings of yellowtail have changed from being fairly
evenly distributed between commercial and recreational fishers from 1982 - 1992,
to one more dominated by commercial interests since 1993. On the Atlantic
coast of Florida catches have fluctuated without any discernable trend from 1982
- 2000. In recent years, Atlantic coast landings have been somewhat lower,
now averaging approximately 167,000 pounds. On the Gulf coast, landings
have fluctuated around 1.8 million pounds since 1996. In 2003, FWRI
reported that yellowtail snapper landings were 4% lower statewide than in the
previous 5 years.
The statewide commercial catch of
yellowtail snapper, Ocyurus chrysurus, between the years 1987 - 2001 was
51.9 million pounds, with a dollar value of over $25.9 million. Within
this time period, 38,001 pounds of yellowtail were harvested commercially in the
5 county area encompassing the IRL (Volusia, Brevard, Indian River, St. Lucie
and Martin Counties), with a dollar value of just $73,332 reported. This
ranks the yellowtail snapper seventy-fourth in commercial value within the IRL,
and eightieth in pounds harvested.
Figure 1 below shows the dollar value of the commercial
yellowtail snapper
fishery to IRL counties by year. As shown, the commercial catch ranged from a low of $2,024 in
1994 to a high of over $11,004 in 1994. St. Lucie County accounts
for the largest percentage of the yellowtail snapper catch with 32.3% in total (Figure 2),
followed by Volusia County, which accounts for 28.7% of the total.
Martin, Brevard and Indian River Counties accounted for 22.0%, 15.0% and 2.1% of
the total respectively.

Figure 1. Annual dollar value of the
commercial catch of yellowtail snapper to the 5-county
area of the Indian River
Lagoon.

Figure 2. Total yellowtail
snapper
dollar value and percentage by county for the years
1987 - 2001.
|
|
VOLUSIA |
BREVARD |
INDIAN |
ST. |
MARTIN |
TOTAL |
|
RIVER |
LUCIE |
| |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Value |
|
YEAR |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
to IRL |
|
1987 |
$629 |
$309 |
$90 |
$1,333 |
$1,700 |
$4,061 |
|
1988 |
$419 |
$326 |
$0 |
$2,429 |
$237 |
$3,411 |
|
1989 |
$366 |
$778 |
$29 |
$4,887 |
$1,262 |
$7,322 |
|
1990 |
$518 |
$950 |
$36 |
$258 |
$731 |
$2,493 |
|
1991 |
$133 |
$840 |
$67 |
$6,342 |
$1,570 |
$8,952 |
|
1992 |
$2,956 |
$1,666 |
$782 |
$4,257 |
$1,343 |
$11,004 |
|
1993 |
$728 |
$1,604 |
$104 |
$874 |
$1,063 |
$4,373 |
|
1994 |
$828 |
$289 |
$93 |
$350 |
$464 |
$2,024 |
|
1995 |
$1,629 |
$281 |
$0 |
$184 |
$260 |
$2,354 |
|
1996 |
$2,524 |
$1,874 |
$282 |
$71 |
$947 |
$5,698 |
|
1997 |
$3,300 |
$265 |
$0 |
$174 |
$75 |
$3,814 |
|
1998 |
$3,754 |
$1,268 |
$0 |
$833 |
$289 |
$6,144 |
|
1999 |
$1,309 |
$123 |
$4 |
$21 |
$1,042 |
$2,499 |
|
2000 |
$516 |
$66 |
$3 |
$355 |
$4,688 |
$5,628 |
|
2001 |
$1,404 |
$357 |
$14 |
$1,311 |
$469 |
$3,555 |
|
Cumulative Totals: |
$21,013 |
$10,996 |
$1,504 |
$23,679 |
$16,140 |
$73,332 |
Table 1. Total dollar value of IRL
yellowtail
snapper, Ocyurus chrysurus, from 1987 - 2001.
|
|
VOLUSIA |
BREVARD |
INDIAN |
ST. |
MARTIN |
|
RIVER |
LUCIE |
| |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
YEAR |
Total |
Total |
Total |
Total |
Total |
|
1987 |
15.49% |
7.61% |
2.22% |
32.82% |
41.86% |
|
1988 |
12.28% |
9.56% |
0.00% |
71.21% |
6.95% |
|
1989 |
5.00% |
10.63% |
0.40% |
66.74% |
17.24% |
|
1990 |
20.78% |
38.11% |
1.44% |
10.35% |
29.32% |
|
1991 |
1.49% |
9.38% |
0.75% |
70.84% |
17.54% |
|
1992 |
26.86% |
15.14% |
7.11% |
38.69% |
12.20% |
|
1993 |
16.65% |
36.68% |
2.38% |
19.99% |
24.31% |
|
1994 |
40.91% |
14.28% |
4.59% |
17.29% |
22.92% |
|
1995 |
69.20% |
11.94% |
0.00% |
7.82% |
11.05% |
|
1996 |
44.30% |
32.89% |
4.95% |
1.25% |
16.62% |
|
1997 |
86.52% |
6.95% |
0.00% |
4.56% |
1.97% |
|
1998 |
61.10% |
20.64% |
0.00% |
13.56% |
4.70% |
|
1999 |
52.38% |
4.92% |
0.16% |
0.84% |
41.70% |
|
2000 |
9.17% |
1.17% |
0.05% |
6.31% |
83.30% |
|
2001 |
39.49% |
10.04% |
0.39% |
36.88% |
13.19% |
Table 2. By-county annual and cumulative percentages of the yellowtail
snapper
harvest for the years 1987-2001.
|
|
Volusia |
Brevard |
Indian River |
St. Lucie |
Martin |
|
Dollars |
$21,013 |
$10,996 |
$1,504 |
$23,679 |
$16,140 |
|
% |
28.7% |
| |